Harm, remedy, time bar

A harmful act, knowledge of the harm and of the liable person, and a supplied elapsed period under art. 258 — asked in plain words. Search finds the tort-benefit bar; the engine decides whether the remedy is excluded.

Someone caused me harm directly. I know about the harm and who is liable. The claim from that act arose; the limitation period for the harmful-act claim has elapsed; there are no pending criminal proceedings. Under the UAE Civil Transactions Law, is my remedy against that person still open?

That sounds like the art. 258 time bar over a harmful act — articles 246–247 and 249 in this model, not a sale-price spine. I will not recite the period from memory. I will ask Arxo Law which addresses it returns.

The search names HarmfulActLimitationExcludesRemedy and the comparative head remedium_exclusum. I will read that head before I supply facts.

Your facts give me the harmful act, direct causation, the claim from the act, both knowledge findings, the elapsed period, and the comparative joins. I will not invent "claim not heard" or "remedy excluded" — those are for the engine.

TRUE_ONLY — the remedy is excluded. Fourteen rules fired; two packages contributed (tort-benefit and the comparative dictionary). Art. 258 lives in tort-benefit here; the measured exclusum path is depth four. Elapsed status was a fact you gave; this slice does not count the days. So no: on these facts the remedy is not still open.